For example, Foley in his 2019 paper “Preparing for a Disputed Presidential Election: An Exercise in Election Risk Assessment and Management,” outlined a scenario in which President Donald Trump seems to have won in battleground Pennsylvania, only to have the slowly counted absentee and provisional ballots flip the outcome. In an extreme case, he said, the state legislature could try to appoint electors to the Electoral College, which selects the president, instead of relying on the popular vote.
“The basic issue is whether or not there could be a political climate developing that could cause the state legislature to distrust the popular vote to repudiate it,” Foley said, recalling the 2000 presidential election dispute in Florida, in which the U.S. Supreme Court eventually declared George W. Bush the winner. “[Democratic candidate Al] Gore ultimately accepted the Supreme Court decision,” Foley said. “He didn’t have to.”
Pushing For Change
Thirty-four states allow election officials to begin “processing” absentee ballots prior to Election Day, according to NCSL. While that means different things in different states, it generally includes opening the outer envelopes, verifying signatures and scanning bar codes. Some states allow removal of the ballots from the inner envelopes and preparation for counting (smoothing ballots and arranging them face up for feeding into counting machines).
On the opposite end, Massachusetts, Maryland and Mississippi don’t allow the processing to begin until the polls close.
In Pennsylvania, state Sen. Judith Schwank, a Democrat who spearheaded a previous move in Pennsylvania for mail-in voting without an excuse, says the legislature should move on pre-canvassing as well.
“I’m worried that so much doubt has been cast in the public’s mind,” she said in a phone interview. “It will work, it can work, it’s just that counting can take a long time. I’m on the ballot too, but I’m not so worried about my election — that will probably be resolved within a week. But the president … it’s a threat to democracy.”
Pennsylvania state Sen. Steve Santarsiero, a Democrat, is gathering cosponsors for a bill to allow a 21-day pre-canvassing period. In his letter urging his peers to sign on, Santarsiero said “counties have struggled to process and tally ballots in a timely way.”
He noted that by June 9, the date of the letter, a number of counties still had not completed the count from the June 2 primary in which 1.8 million Pennsylvanians requested ballots. It took almost two weeks for Pennsylvania to count all the primary ballots.
In a phone interview, Santarsiero said it would not surprise him if the general election took even longer to count. He suggested this was not a partisan issue. “I can’t understand how anyone could come to the conclusion that this is advantaging one side or the other.”
But Pennsylvania’s Republicans don’t seem enthused.
More Articles
- The GAO Finds: Elder Financial Exploitation — The Fraudulent or IIlegal Use of An Older Adult's Funds or Property — Has Far-reaching Effects on Victims and Society
- How are States Prioritizing Who Will Get the COVID-19 Vaccine First? CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Released an Interim Recommendation For the Highest Priority Group
- The Electoral College: How America Chooses Its President; They’re Really Voting for the Slate of Electors Put Forward by the Political Party their Candidate Belongs To
- Race and Woman Suffrage, an Excerpt from One Room At a Time: How Women Entered Party Politics
- Stateline: Many Faithful Say It’s Time to Gather. Some Governors Disagree
- Weekly National Summary of Week 50: Outpatient Illness Surveillance, Geographic Spread, Mortality Surveillance
- Jo Freeman's Review of Michael Barone's How America’s Political Parties Change (And How They Don’t)
- Stateline: How One School Is Tackling the Youth Vaping Epidemic
- States Flubbed the Rollout of Their Health Insurance Exchanges. Now They’re Ready to Try Again
- STATELINE: How Disaster Warnings Can Get Your Attention