GAO Found: There Is No Single Source of Publicly Available, Comprehensive &Timely Data on Executive Branch Appointees
Image: Cyberbullying section of Health and Human Services US government website
Federal ethics programs seek to safeguard the integrity of governmental decision-making. That includes oversight of political appointees serving in the executive branch.
The GAO* reviewed information available on executive branch political appointees and examined 3 agencies' ethics programs. They found:
There is no single source of publicly available, comprehensive, and timely data on appointees
2 of the 3 agencies we examined could strengthen their programs
We made recommendations to improve the ethics programs in 2 of the agencies we reviewed, and also asked Congress to consider requiring the collection and publishing of information on appointees.
What GAO Found
There is no single source of data on political appointees serving in the executive branch that is publicly available, comprehensive, and timely. Political appointees make or advocate policy for a presidential administration or support those positions. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and two nongovernmental organizations collect, and in some cases, report data on political appointees, but the data are incomplete. For example, the data did not include information on political appointee positions within the Executive Office of the President. The White House Office of Presidential Personnel (PPO) maintains data but does not make them publicly available.
The public has an interest in knowing the political appointees serving and this information would facilitate congressional oversight and hold leaders accountable. As of March 2019, no agency in the federal government is required to publicly report comprehensive and timely data on political appointees serving in the executive branch. OPM is positioned to maintain and make political appointee data publicly available on a timely basis but is limited in its ability to provide comprehensive data. PPO has more comprehensive data but may not be positioned to publish data on a recurring basis. Ultimately, it is a policy decision as to which agency is best positioned to report comprehensive and timely data on political appointees.
Pages: 1 · 2
More Articles
- Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol
- Pew Trust: Voter Enthusiasm at Record High in Nationalized Midterm Environment
- The Looming Threat to Sex Education: A Resurgence of Federal Funding for Abstinence-Only Programs?
- Confessions of a Catholic (Who Doesn't Believe in Confession)
- Reprise, Bobby Kennedy, The Train: "Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope"
- Senate Confirmation Hearings Schedule for The Week Beginning on the 1/09/17 and Financial Disclosure Reports
- In Case You Were Wondering: The Office of Government Ethics and Use of Government Position and Resources
- Building Character; A Lesson From Six Children
- When Norms Clash With Formal Laws: How Does a Society Encourage More Whistleblowing?
- For a Respected Prosecutor, An Unpardonable Failure