In a randomized double-blind study, science faculty from research-intensive universities rated the application materials of a student — who was randomly assigned either a male or female name — for a laboratory manager position. Faculty participants rated the male applicant as significantly more competent and hireable than the (identical) female applicant. These participants also selected a higher starting salary and offered more career mentoring to the male applicant. The gender of the faculty participants did not affect responses, such that female and male faculty were equally likely to exhibit bias against the female student.
Mediation analyses indicated that the female student was less likely to be hired because she was viewed as less competent. We also assessed faculty participants’ preexisting subtle bias against women using a standard instrument and found that preexisting subtle bias against women played a moderating role, such that subtle bias against women was associated with less support for the female student, but was unrelated to reactions to the male student. These results suggest that interventions addressing faculty gender bias might advance the goal of increasing the participation of women in science.
Pages: 1 · 2
More Articles
- I Remember When
- Aging America: The Cities That Are Graying The Fastest
- The Day the Baby Fell in Love
- Of Horizons and Hope
- Cuba Today
- The Holidays: So Help Me, Muse . . . To Rhyme my News
- Elaine Soloway's Rookie Caregiver Series: Take Care of Yourself
- Loss
- Elaine Soloway's Caregiving Series: Grateful He's a Tightwad
- CultureWatch: A Debut Author - The Warmth of Other Suns; DVD Tip: The Forsyte Saga
