Planned Parenthood and Laws Affecting Reproductive Health and Rights: State Trends at Midyear, 2015
Based on the most recent data, Planned Parenthood health centers serve 36% of all clients obtaining care from publicly funded family planning centers, more than any other type of provider. Similarly, Planned Parenthood health centers serve 37% of clients obtaining care at health centers that receive Title X funding. The source for both statistics is this Guttmacher Institute report.
July 1, 2015
So far this year, states have enacted 51 new abortion restrictions; this brings the number of restrictions enacted since 2010 to 282. Although only about a dozen states remain in session as of July 1, these states may well enact additional restrictions before the end of the year. Following the recent pattern of increased restrictions in odd-numbered years (largely because not all legislatures are in session in even-numbered years), states have enacted more restrictions during the first half of this year than during all of last year (see chart). But nonetheless, the number of new restrictions this year is well below the 70 enacted in 2013, due in part to fewer restrictions being enacted in a handful of states — including Kansas, Oklahoma and Arizona — that had adopted multiple restrictions between 2011 and 2014.
Even as states continue to pass new abortion restrictions, the Supreme Court is poised to hear one, and maybe two, major abortion cases in the coming year. The Court might take a case challenging a 2013 Texas law that requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at a local hospital and imposes Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP) requirements on abortion clinics in the state. The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld the law in May. In June, the Supreme Court granted a request for an emergency stay, blocking enforcement of the provisions. Abortion rights supporters are widely expected to file a full appeal to the Supreme Court in the coming months (see The State of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in the State of Texas: A Cautionary Tale). In addition, the Court is weighing whether or not to hear a case in the fall centering on Mississippi's law requiring abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges.
More Articles
- Department of Labor Awards $5M to Train, Expand Pathways for Women for Registered Apprenticeships, Nontraditional Occupations
- Julia Sneden Wrote: Going Forth On the Fourth After Strict Blackout Conditions and Requisitioned Gunpowder Had Been the Law
- Voting Rights: Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke Testifies Before the Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing; “One of the most monumental laws in the entire history of American freedom”
- Journalist's Resource: Religious Exemptions and Required Vaccines; Examining the Research
- Jo Freeman Reviews: Lady Bird Johnson: Hiding in Plain Sight
- Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), February 8th: This Early Stage of the COVID-19 Vaccine Roll-Out, Most Older Adults Have Not Yet Been Vaccinated As Supply Remains Limited
- How are States Prioritizing Who Will Get the COVID-19 Vaccine First? CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Released an Interim Recommendation For the Highest Priority Group
- Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden We’ve never backed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history — until now
- Stateline: Search and Rescue Teams, Already Stretched Thin, See Surge in Calls
- Stateline: Many Faithful Say It’s Time to Gather. Some Governors Disagree