Having a Field Day With the Candidates: Judging Oratorical Skills of Hillary and Donald on the Trail
Hillary's speaking style suffers from being the reverse. She is too predictably 'on script,' making her delivery sound mechanically driven, rather than 'in the moment' inspiring. When she does veer from her teleprompter, she measures her words carefully, punctuating them with a lot of annoying "uhs". Maybe it’s a matter of wanting to be safe instead of sorry, but her dull rhetoric can sound pretty sorry in itself, even without apology. She sternly berates Trump about how "words matter". Yet her own personal dilemma is that the majority of Americans do not take her at her word.
As in all forms of social media, much of what sells a speech is the sizzle, not the steak. The evasive quality called 'delivery' is crucial to the credibility of a candidate. At the same time, the sense of frankness that comes from 'moving off message,' can also unintentionally lead to damaging misinterpretations. Both candidates have landed in hot water over unscripted remarks. But it's Trump whose goose is continually being cooked.
In the weeks ahead, will he adopt a more cautious speaking style? Not likely, because, ironically, the unscripted outsider moment has also become part of Donald Trump's appeal. Rhetorically speaking, Hillary Clinton finds safety in boredom while her opponent finds boredom in safety. Indeed, what may be packing Trump’s rallies to the rafters is this very quality of seeming spontaneity, dangerous though it may prove.
I think it's fair to say that the faithful flock to Trump's tents in anticipation of being treated to a taste of his notoriously blunt speaking style. They seem to love it when he throws in the vintage Trump "believe me" or "it's a disaster." His use of adjectives to describe others may seem crass or silly, but they stick.
Body language also plays a "huuuuge" part. in public speaking. Hillary plods slowly onto the stage at her rallies, clapping her hands, smiling broadly, hugging dignitaries, pointing to the audience – and grabbing the microphone almost immediately. She grandly waves her arms and jabs her fingers for emphasis. Her platitudinous pronouncements rarely receive rousing cheers. Some of those in the 'rainbow coalition' seated behind Mrs. Clinton on the stage seem glassy-eyed and distracted. An exception was Seddique Mateen, the Orlando nightclub shooter's father, who jumped up and waved the small American flag, even as Hillary bemoaned the tragedy wrought by his dead son.
At gatherings of the Trump faithful. there is a different vibe; he speaks to — not at — his supporters in an almost conspiratorial tone . Often Trump will ponder aloud what he should do in light of the latest campaign developments. Should he punch back at those who attack him? Is there anyone in the audience from Utah? Don't you love New Hampshire? … I love New Hampshire! This is the entertainer in Donald Trump that, at its best, can grab an audience by the seat of its pants. FDR, also a New Yorker, was a very different kind of candidate. But he accomplished a similar coziness with his audiences through his fireside chats.
Other past presidents, like Reagan and Lincoln, possessed an indefinable speaking quality that connected with listeners. It's a good trait, but it isn't always found in a good person. Adolf Hitler was a powerful pubic speaker. Arnold Schwarzenegger allegedly praised Hitler once while being interviewed and was roundly criticized for it. But the fact is that Hitler managed to mobilize an entire nation through the power of the spoken word.
We're into the final stretch of an election in which both candidates have regrettably high personal negatives. Hillary's aides may be concerned that she sounds too shrill and comes across as a moralizing schoolmarm. Trump's team may by now have had it with his contentious adlibbing. There will be many more stump talk in the months to come. But the contrast of their styles and substance will matter most during the three crucial presidential debates planned. That's when the rubber of speech will truly hit the road.
©2016 Doris O'Brien for SeniorWomen.com
Pages: 1 · 2
More Articles
- Antony Blinken, Secretary of State: Building A More Resilient Information Environment
- National Archives Records Lay Foundation for Killers of the Flower Moon: The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI
- Nichola D. Gutgold - The Most Private Roosevelt Makes a Significant Public Contribution: Ethel Carow Roosevelt Derby
- Oppenheimer: July 28 UC Berkeley Panel Discussion Focuses On The Man Behind The Movie
- Selective Exposure and Partisan Echo Chambers in Television News Consumption: Innovative Use of Data Yields Unprecedented Insights
- Jo Freeman Reviews Thank You For Your Servitude: Donald Trump's Washington and the Price of Submission
- "Henry Ford Innovation Nation", a Favorite Television Show
- Julia Sneden Wrote: Going Forth On the Fourth After Strict Blackout Conditions and Requisitioned Gunpowder Had Been the Law
- Encountering the News From the British Library's Breaking the News Exhibition: Unsettling, But Exciting
- Jo Freeman Reviews: Gendered Citizenship: The Original Conflict Over the Equal Rights Amendment, 1920 – 1963