Fact Tank: Voters Have Little Confidence Clinton or Trump Would Help Workers Get Skills They Need to Compete
Editor's Note: Having lived on Merritt Island, Florida (at both Satellite and Indian Harbour Beaches) as an Patrick Air Force Base family, we hope for those people both leaving and staying in the Cocoa Beach area during Matthew's landfall. We've been through hurricanes on both Florida coasts as well as the Connecticut coast. Be safe.
As the demand for high-skilled workers continues to grow, American voters express relatively little confidence in either major party presidential candidate when it comes to their ability to help American workers prepare to compete in today’s economy. Most question whether the campaign has focused enough on this issue.
A Pew Research Center survey, conducted Sept. 1-4, 2016, among 1,004 adults (including 815 registered voters), asked voters which of five key issues would be most important in their vote for president. The economy tops the list, with 37% of registered voters saying this will be the most important issue for them. An additional 18% choose health care and 14% say terrorism. Immigration and gun policy are each named by 13% of voters.
When asked specifically about national economic issues, the job situation shares top billing with the budget deficit in terms of issues that voters say are important to their choice for president. Among the six economic issues tested, 43% of voters say that jobs will be either the most important or the second most important issue to their vote for president; 43% give the same weight to the federal budget deficit. By comparison, other economic issues – tax reform, income inequality, rising prices and global trade – are viewed as less important to voters.
When it comes to helping workers get the skills and training they need to get a well-paying job, a large majority of voters (74%) say the presidential campaign has not focused enough on this issue. Some 14% say about the right amount of attention has been given to this issue and only 6% say the campaign has focused too much on this issue. Republicans, Democrats and independents are equally critical of the campaign in this regard. Roughly equal shares say too little attention has been given to finding ways to prepare workers for good jobs.
Voters are skeptical that either major party candidate would do a good job addressing this issue. When asked what kind of job Donald Trump would do when it comes to helping Americans get the skills and training they need to get a well-paying job, roughly three-in-ten voters say he would do an excellent (15%) or good job (16%). A solid majority say Trump would do only a fair (18%) or poor (47%) job.
Hillary Clinton’s ratings are similar. Some 10% say Clinton would do an excellent job helping workers get the skills and training they need, and an additional 18% say she would do a good job. Roughly two-thirds say Clinton would do only a fair (26%) or poor (42%) job dealing with this issue.
Not surprisingly, responses are sharply divided along partisan lines. Two-thirds of Republican voters (66%) say Trump would do an excellent or good job helping workers get the training they need, while only 6% of Democratic voters agree. Even so, a significant minority of Republicans (30%) say Trump would do only a fair or poor job at this.
Among Democratic voters, 57% say Clinton would do an excellent or good job helping Americans get the skills and training they need to get well-paying jobs. Some 42% of Democrats say Clinton would do only a fair or poor job in this area. Only 6% of Republicans say Clinton would do an excellent or good job, while 89% say she would do a fair or poor job.
Independent voters don't have a lot of confidence in either candidate to do a good job on this issue: 67% say Trump would do a fair or poor job when it comes to helping American workers get the skills and training they need, and 79% say the same about Clinton.
- Something Old, Something New: Wearing Red to Show Solidarity in Major Cities All Over the World
- Are the Courts Finally Ready to Deem the Religious or Racial Exclusion of Immigrants Unconstitutional?
- Updated: This Rule Just Negated by President Trump Through Executive Order: The Stream Protection Rule That Protected Drinking Water for 100 Million in the US
- Coretta Scott King: Jeff Sessions Would ‘Irreparably Damage’ My Husband’s Work
- Jo Freeman Writes An open letter to Donald Trump about the Women’s March on Washington
- Executive Order - - - Minimizing the Economic Burden of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Pending Repeal
- Protesting the Inaugural: The Day Before
- Interstate Health Insurance: Sounds Good, But Details Are Tricky
- Janet Yellen Speaks at a Teachers Town Hall Meeting; The Gender Gap in Economics and the Leaky Pipeline Problem
- "Operating Under A Cloud of Uncertainty": Janet Yellen's FOMC Press Conference About Raising the Target Range for Federal Funds Rate to 1/2 to 3/4 %