Testifying in support of the bill, Michael J. New, PhD, assistant professor at the University of Michigan, Dearborn, said, “I would encourage members of the committee to support the ‘Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act.’ This piece of legislation would give parents more involvement over how their minor daughters resolve their pregnancies. It is safe to say that parents have more invested in the well being of their minor daughters than a boyfriend, a friend, or a relative. They would also likely have the best knowledge of their daughter’s medical history. There have been reported instances where minor girls obtained abortions without their parents’ knowledge and died because they did not realize they were allergic to the anesthesia.” He concluded, “I am confident the ‘Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act’ would lead to both fewer abortions and better public health outcomes for teen girls.”
Dr. Katherine Hancock Ragsdale, president and dean at the Episcopal Divinity School, testified against the act: “I find it troubling, even horrifying, that we should find ourselves at odds over this issue – and devoting yet more legislative time to it at a time when so many national crises require your attention. Presumably we all want the same things here. We want fewer unintended pregnancies and we want young people who face problems, particularly problems that have to do with their health and their futures, to receive loving support and counsel from responsible adults. This bill, however, doesn't help to achieve those goals. We should be talking, instead, about evidence-based, age-appropriate sex education for all young people, and about safe, affordable, and available contraception. We should be figuring out how we impress upon boys that ‘no’ really does mean ‘no,’ and about how to teach girls to defend themselves. We should be talking about education and economics; about child care and welfare; about violence at home and on the streets; not about new ways to punish victims and those who care for them. Yet, no matter how intense and successful our efforts, there will still be minors who face unintended pregnancies. And some of them will still decide that abortion is the best – sometimes the most responsible – option for them. And then, as now, we will want them to be able to turn to their parents for love and support and guidance. But when they can’t, we want them to turn to some responsible adult. Please don’t outlaw the very help we want our children to have. Oppose this bill. Oppose it because no matter how good the intentions of its authors and supporters, it is, in essence, punitive and mean-spirited.”
Also speaking in support of the legislation, Teresa Stanton Collett, professor of law at the University of St. Thomas School of Law, discussed the constitutionality of the law, saying, “Opponents of CIANA [Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act] have persistently claimed that passage of the law would violate the constitutional right to travel and would exceed congressional authority under the interstate commerce clause. Both claims are baseless. CIANA is a legitimate exercise of congressional authority under its authority to regulate interstate commerce. ‘To keep the channels of commerce free from immoral and injurious uses has been frequently sustained, and is no longer open to question.’ The Supreme Court has repeatedly said crossing state lines is interstate commerce regardless of whether any commercial activity is involved.” Ms. Collett continued: “In balancing the minor’s right to privacy and her need for parental involvement, the majority of states have determined that parents should know before abortions are performed on minors. This is a reasonable conclusion and well within the states’ police powers. However, the political authority of each state stops at its geographic boundaries. States need the assistance of the federal government to insure that the protection they wish to afford their children is not easily circumvented by strangers taking minors across state lines.” She added, “The ‘Child Interstate Parental Notification Act’ has the unique virtue of building upon two of the few points of agreement in the national debate over abortion: the desirability of parental involvement in a minor’s decisions about an unplanned pregnancy, and the need to protect the physical health and safety of the pregnant girl. I urge members of this committee to vote for its passage.”
Courtesy of Women's Policy, Inc: WPI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization whose sole focus is to help ensure that the most informed decisions on key women's issues are made by policymakers at the federal, state, and local levels. Audiences include elected officials, regulators, women's groups, labor groups, academia, the business community, the media, and the general public
Pages: 1 · 2
More Articles
- Finally? NIH to Evaluate Effectiveness of Male Contraceptive Skin Gel; Researchers Plan to Enroll 420 Couples in Clinical Trial
- California State Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones Statement on Trump Rule to Restrict Funds for Women's Health Services
- The Looming Threat to Sex Education: A Resurgence of Federal Funding for Abstinence-Only Programs?
- Congress: A Number of Measures for Women Veterans, Child Protection, Protecting Young Victims from Sexual Abuse Act, Federal Interns Protection Act, Opioid Epidemic
- Ten Ways That the House American Health Care Act Could Affect Women
- ‘Yes Means Yes’: Grappling With Teen Sexual Assault
- Hearings on Zika and Campus Safety: Bills On Eliminating Pornography from Federal Computers, Opioid Use, Sexual Assault Survivors
- ProPublica: Activists Pursue Private Abortion Details Using Public Records Laws
- Planned Parenthood and Laws Affecting Reproductive Health and Rights: State Trends at Midyear, 2015
- Congressional Bills Introduced: Abortion, Infant Abduction, Human Trafficking & Child Exploitation, Empowering Relatives, Friends, and Co-workers of Domestic Violence Victims to Create Safety Plans