Editor's Note: In addition to the information below, The Center for Science in the Public Interest has created an article, Going Organic: What's the Payoff? that might be interesting for the consumer and shopper. Page 4 of the article has a box, Scoring Pesticides. The article below is from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the CDC.

Jennifer Di Noia, PhD

Fragaria vesca L.jpg, Atlas des plantes de France. 1891. Wikimedia Commons

Abstract

National nutrition guidelines emphasize consumption of powerhouse fruits and vegetables (PFV), foods most strongly associated with reduced chronic disease risk; yet efforts to define PFV are lacking. This study developed and validated a classification scheme defining PFV as foods providing, on average, 10% or more daily value per 100 kcal of 17 qualifying nutrients. Of 47 foods studied, 41 satisfied the powerhouse criterion and were more nutrient-dense than were non-PFV, providing preliminary evidence of the validity of the classification scheme. The proposed classification scheme is offered as a tool for nutrition education and dietary guidance.

Top of Page

Objective

Powerhouse fruits and vegetables (PFV), foods most strongly associated with reduced chronic disease risk, are described as green leafy, yellow/orange, citrus, and cruciferous items, but a clear definition of PFV is lacking (1). Defining PFV on the basis of nutrient and phytochemical constituents is suggested (1). However, uniform data on food phytochemicals and corresponding intake recommendations are lacking (2). This article describes a classification scheme defining PFV on the basis of 17 nutrients of public health importance per the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Institute of Medicine (ie, potassium, fiber, protein, calcium, iron, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, folate, zinc, and vitamins A, B₆, B₁₂, C, D, E, and K) (3).

Top of Page

Methods

This cross-sectional study identified PFV in a 3-step process. First, a tentative list of PFV consisting of green leafy, yellow/orange, citrus, and cruciferous items was generated on the basis of scientific literature (4,5) and consumer guidelines (6,7). Berry fruits and allium vegetables were added in light of their associations with reduced risks for cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases and some cancers (8). For each, and for 4 items (apples, bananas, corn, and potatoes) described elsewhere as low-nutrient-dense (1), information was collected in February 2014 on amounts of the 17 nutrients and kilocalories per 100 g of food (9). Because preparation methods can alter the nutrient content of foods (2), nutrient data were for the items in raw form.

Pages: 1 · 2

More Articles

• The Pros and Cons of ‘Free College’ and ‘College Promise’ Programs: What the Research Says
• Stateline: How One School Is Tackling the Youth Vaping Epidemic
• Living Longer, Too? Native-born Californians Who Live Near Large Immigrant Populations Eat Healthier Foods
• Lisa Bronner: Five Life Habits for Healthy Skin - The Foundation of Healthy Skin Begins with Habits That May Appear Unconnected
• Legislators and Community Leaders Debating Ways to Boost the Number of Children Who Are Up to Date on School-Mandated Vaccinations
• On the Buses with Older Warrior Women
• Has Your Doctor Asked You About Climate Change? “Plants are flowering earlier in the spring; after hot summers, trees are releasing more pollen the following season”
• Barriers to Health Care Experienced by Women in the United States; Harvard Health on Screening Women Over 75; USPSTF Guidelines for Women Over 50
• Developing an Artificial Intelligence Tool to Help Detect Brain Aneurysms at Stanford
• Jo Freeman's Review of The Road to Healing: A Civil Rights Reparations Story in Prince Edward County, Virginia