Young Women Still May Be Getting Unnecessary Pelvic Exams; UCSF and CDC Study Finds Millions of "Outdated" Tests Being Performed on Healthy Females 15 to 20 Years Old
By Elizabeth Fernandez, UCSF.edu, January 6, 2020

Pelvic examinations and cervical cancer screenings are no longer recommended for most females under age 21 during routine health visits, but a new study has found that millions of young women are unnecessarily undergoing the tests, which can lead to false-positive testing, over-treatment, anxiety and needless cost.
Researchers at UC San Francisco and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that 1.4 million pelvic examinations and 1.6 million Pap tests performed on U.S. females 15 to 20 years old in a single year may have been medically unnecessary.
The findings suggest that despite professional guidelines and recommendations against routine pelvic examinations and Pap tests in this age group, there’s a critical lag in clinical practice. The estimated cost of these unnecessary exams was approximately $123 million a year.
The study appears Jan. 6, 2020 in JAMA Internal Medicine.
“Recent media reports have called attention to inappropriate gynecologic examinations in young women,” said senior author George F. Sawaya, MD, professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at UCSF and director of the UCSF Center for Healthcare Value.
Parents of adolescents and young women should be aware that cervical cancer screening is not recommended routinely in this age group of 15 to 20 years old. - George F. Sawaya, MD
“Parents of adolescents and young women should be aware that cervical cancer screening is not recommended routinely in this age group of 15 to 20 years old. Pelvic exams are not necessary prior to getting most contraceptives and are often not needed to screen for sexually transmissible infections,” Sawaya said.
Cervical cancer screening is not recommended for individuals under age 21, according to the US Preventive Services Task Force, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the American Cancer Society. Additionally, leading professional organizations recommend against performing pelvic examinations in asymptomatic women who are not pregnant.
Pages: 1 · 2
More Articles
- Center for Strategic and International Studies: “The Future Outlook with Dr. Anthony Fauci”
- Women Exposed to Persistent Organic Pollutants Had Slightly Smaller Fetuses than Women Who Haven’t Been Exposed
- Barriers to Health Care Experienced by Women in the United States; Harvard Health on Screening Women Over 75; USPSTF Guidelines for Women Over 50
- Skydivers Don’t Need Parachutes, Scientists Don’t Actually Find: Be wary of parachute journalism. And also parachute research.
- The Looming Threat to Sex Education: A Resurgence of Federal Funding for Abstinence-Only Programs?
- New Regulations Broadening Employer Exemptions to Contraceptive Coverage: For Many Women, Their Employers Will Determine Whether They Have No-cost Coverage to the Full Range of FDA Approved Methods
- New York State Raises the Minimum Age for Marriage to 17 Years of Age; The Rate of Child Marriage Varies Widely by State
- Diversity in Innovation: Documenting a Systematic and Persistent Lack of Female, Hispanic, and African American Labor Market Participation in the Innovation Sector
- Ten Ways That the House American Health Care Act Could Affect Women
- Stumbling on Secrets