While Washington Fiddles, California Leaders Forge Ideas For Universal Health Care
As the nation's Republican leaders huddle to reconsider their plans to "repeal and replace" the nation's health law, advocates for universal health coverage press on in California, armed with renewed political will and a new set of proposals.
Organized labor and two lawmakers are leading the charge for a single, government-financed program for everyone in the state. Another legislator wants to create a commission that would weigh the best options for a system to cover everyone. And Democratic Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, who hopes to become the next governor, has suggested building on employer-based health care to plug holes in existing coverage.
California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsome
The proposals are fueled both by a fear of losing gains under the Affordable Care Act and a sense that the law doesn't go far enough toward covering everyone and cutting costs.
But heath policy experts say that creating any type of universal health plan would face enormous political and fiscal challenges — and that if it happens at all, it could take years.
The most specific California proposal comes from state Sens. Ricardo Lara (D-Bell Gardens) and Toni Atkins (D-San Diego), co-authors of legislation that would take steps toward creating one publicly financed "single-payer" program. The bill, co-sponsored by the California Nurses Association, would aim for something like a system of "Medicare for all" in which the government, not insurers, provides payments and sets coverage rules.
Lara said the approach would get California closer to a system "that covers more and costs less." The bill's authors haven't announced how the program would be funded. And that’s where the biggest obstacle lies, said Oberlander: It would largely uproot California's present system, in which roughly half of coverage is sponsored by employers. If "you're going to take health insurance largely out of the market, you're going to disconnect it from employers," he said. "Then you have to make up all the financing that you're going to lose."
There’s no way to make up for those lost employer contributions other than to introduce "very visible taxes," Oberlander said. And that's not the only reason why a single payer plan would be controversial. "A lot of people are satisfied with what they have," he said.
The trade group for insurers in California does not support the single-payer idea. "A single-payer system would make the quality of our health care worse, not better," said Charles Bacchi, president and CEO of the California Association of Health Plans. "We've made substantial progress in expanding and increasing access to and quality of care — this step backwards would be particularly devastating for Californians."
Pages: 1 · 2
More Articles
- Emily's List Statement On Voting Rights Vs Senator Sinema's Lack of Support for Legislation on Voting Rights
- Updated Subsidy Calculator and 300+ FAQs Help Consumers Understand the ACA Marketplaces as Open Enrollment Begins
- Kaiser Health Foundation: Distributing a COVID-19 Vaccine Across the U.S. - A Look at Key Issues
- Kaiser Family Foundation: Eligibility for ACA Health Coverage Following Job Loss; What Is ESI?
- Coronavirus Is Keeping Me Home From Work. Will I Get Paid?
- The Uber and Lyft of Dog Walking Fight State Oversight
- 4.7 Million Uninsured People Nationally Could Get a No-Premium Bronze Plan in the ACA Marketplace, Though Deductibles Would be High
- A Pew Research Report: Most Americans Find Cohabitation Acceptable, Even for Couples Who Don’t Plan to Get Married
- Poll: Democrats Say They Are Hearing Enough From Presidential Candidates About Medicare-for-All and Expanding Coverage, But Want Them to Talk More about Health Costs and Women’s Health Care
- Barriers to Health Care Experienced by Women in the United States; Harvard Health on Screening Women Over 75; USPSTF Guidelines for Women Over 50