The initial announcement stated that a bill would be introduced during the next sitting week of the Parliament, and that interim regulatory measures had been taken under the Arms Act 1983 to reclassify certain weapons as Military Style Semi-automatics (MSSAs), the purchase of which requires an “E endorsement” on firearms licenses, thereby immediately preventing their sale to standard license-holders. (Id.; Arms Act 1983, New Zealand Legislation website. For information on firearms law in New Zealand, see Kelly Buchanan, Firearms-Control Legislation and Policy: New Zealand (Law Library of Congress, Feb. 2013).)
Following the introduction of the Bill, the government moved that it be considered under the “urgency” procedures in the Parliament’s Standing Orders. (Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), Vol. 737 (Apr. 2, 2019), Chris Hipkins (Leader of the House), Arms (Prohibited Firearms, Magazines, and Parts ) Amendment Bill – Procedure.) This allows a bill to be “proceeded with to a completion at that sitting of the House, and the sitting is extended accordingly.” (New Zealand Parliament, Standing Orders 2017, SO 58(1). See also What is ‘Urgency’?, NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT (May 25, 2017).)
A truncated select committee process was conducted for the Bill, with a report-back date of April 8, 2019. (Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), Vol. 737 (Apr. 2, 2019), Stuart Nash (Minister of Police), Arms (Prohibited Firearms, Magazines, and Parts) Amendment Bill – First Reading.) The Finance and Expenditure Committee received more than 13,000 submissions on the Bill and held one day of hearings, with certain submitters invited to present their submissions to the Committee in person. Of the submissions received by the Committee, “about 60 percent supported the bill, 26 percent were opposed to the bill, and 14 percent expressed another view.” (Arms (Prohibited Firearms, Magazines, and Parts) Amendment Bill: Submissions and Advice, NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT (last visited Apr. 16, 2019); Finance and Expenditure Committee, New Zealand Parliament, Arms (Prohibited Firearms, Magazines, and Parts) Amendment Bill – Final Report 4 (Apr. 2019).)
The Committee recommended several amendments to the Bill. These included expanding a proposed exemption to the prohibitions on relevant firearms to allow their use by professional pest control businesses on private land, rather than only on Department of Conservation land; and “inserting an additional condition of endorsement for bona fide collectors of firearms into clause 31, to require the removed vital part of a prohibited firearm to be stored at a separate address, which would be regulated by the Police.” (Finance and Expenditure Committee, supra, at 4.) These and other changes recommended by the Committee were included in a Supplementary Order Paper that was approved during the Committee of the Whole House stage. (Supplementary Order Paper No. 201, Proposed Amendments to the Arms (Prohibited Firearms, Magazines, and Parts) Amendment Bill.)
The Bill completed the Second Reading stage on April 9, and the Committee of the Whole House and Third Reading stages on April 10. (Arms (Prohibited Firearms, Magazines, and Parts) Amendment Bill, supra.)
Amendments Contained in the Bill
The government’s press release announcing the introduction of the Bill stated that it would amend the Arms Act 1983 to
- Ban semi-automatic weapons and military style semi-automatics (MSSAs)
- Ban parts, magazines and ammunition which can be used to assemble a prohibited firearm or convert a lower-powered firearm into a semi-automatic
- Ban pump action shotguns with more than a five shot capacity
- Ban semi-automatic shotguns with a capacity to hold a detachable magazine, or with an internal magazine capable of holding more than five cartridges
- Exempt some semi-automatic firearms, such as .22 calibres and shotguns, which have limited ammunition capacity
- Create tougher penalties and introduce new offences
- Create new definitions of prohibited firearms, prohibited magazines, prohibited parts and prohibited ammunition
- Establish an amnesty for firearms owners who take steps to hand over unlawful weapons, parts, magazines and ammunition to Police by 30 September 2019 (Press Release, Stuart Nash, supra.)
Further information on the amendments was contained in the explanatory note that accompanied the Bill, which stated that
[t]he Bill seeks to remove semi-automatic firearms from circulation and use by the general population in New Zealand. The Bill achieves this by prohibiting semi-automatic firearms, magazines, and parts that can be used to assemble prohibited firearms.
The prohibition will include the existing category of semi-automatic firearms defined as Military Style Semi-Automatics (MSSAs), which are already subject to greater licensing controls under the Act compared with other types of firearms. The prohibition will extend beyond MSSAs to include most semi-automatic firearms, and some shotguns. Some small-calibre rimfire semi-automatic firearms and lesser-capacity shotguns are excluded from the prohibition. Those excluded firearms are commonly used in the farming, hunting, and recreational communities, and have a limited magazine capacity.
A small number of firearms licence holders are permitted under the Bill to import, sell, supply, and possess semi-automatic firearms and other items for genuine and justifiable reasons. They will need to apply to the Police to obtain the necessary approvals in order to qualify for the exemptions. (Arms (Prohibited Firearms, Magazines, and Parts) Amendment Bill, Government Bill 125-1, Explanatory Note.)
Buyback of Prohibited Firearms
The government’s press release upon the introduction of the Bill included the following statement regarding a proposed buyback of prohibited firearms by the government:
Police and the Treasury are working on the details of the buyback. The underlying principle is that fair and reasonable compensation will be paid. It will take into account the age and type of weapon, and the market value. It is estimated it will cost between $100 million and $200 million. (Press Release, Stuart Nash, supra.)
More Articles
- New York's Jewish Museum: Photography and the American Magazine; When Avant-garde Techniques in Photography and Design Reached the United States via European Emigrés
- Jo Freeman: Five Days in DC Where the Post-election Protests Were Puny but the Politics Were Not
- The Electoral College: How America Chooses Its President; They’re Really Voting for the Slate of Electors Put Forward by the Political Party their Candidate Belongs To
- Jo Freeman Writes: The Political Parentage of Kamala Harris
- Will COVID-19 Shape the 2020 Election? UC Berkeley Scholars Conclude That It Will Be An Election Without Precedent
- An Example of Whistleblower Rights and Protections from the US Department of Justice
- “The Trump-Ukraine Impeachment Inquiry Report” – House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Released the Draft Report to All Members and the Public
- Republican Staff Report Issued December 2, 2019: Report of Evidence in the Democrats Impeachment Inquiry in the House of Representatives
- Updated Again: Deputy Assistant Secy of Defense Laura Cooper's, Croft and Anderson's Transcripts Released: President Trump Directed Freeze on Millions of Military Aid for Ukraine
- Michael Bloomberg's Annual Philanthropy Letter, 2019; Reconsiders Running For President in 2020