When It comes to Speed Dating, Too Much Choice Is a Bad Thing
Based on new research which was published in Biology Letters, England's Royal Society journal.
Psychologists and behaviour scientists have long been interested in the question of how variety affects the choices we make. While previous work has examined how the range of options affects our consumer preferences, this is the first time that the effects of variety have been examined in the choices we make in human relationships.
Alison Lenton and Marco Francesconi studied the choices and characteristics of more than 3600 male and female participants in speed dating events. In these events, roughly equal numbers of female and male dates are given three minutes to talk to each other and later asked whether an individual date is a 'yes' or a 'no'. Participants submit an online profile before the event detailing their age, occupation and other details about their character.
One might imagine that having a wider variety of dates on offer leads to more successful proposals, simply because there is a higher likelihood that participants will come across a date who satisfies their criteria. However, the scientists used participants’ profiles and the information about whether the mini-dates resulted in a 'yes' or 'no' to show that actually, participants are much more likely to say 'no' when presented with a wide variety of choice.
So, does a wide variety of dates simply make us more choosy about who we say 'yes' to? The authors think not, pointing out that "choosers made more proposals when faced with more options, but fewer proposals when these options were highly variable in their attributes, suggesting that choice variety yields greater confusion rather than greater choosiness ... there is nothing to prevent speed daters from 'hedging bets' by choosing several options. Instead, increasing variety led some participants not to choose at all."
What follows is the abstract for the research:
"Choice variety is supposed to increase the likelihood that a chooser's preferences are satisfied. To assess the effects of variety on real-world mate choice, we analysed human dating decisions across 84 speed-dating events (events in which people go on a series of sequential ‘mini-dates’). Results showed that choosers made fewer proposals (positive dating decisions) at events in which the available dates showed greater variety across such attributes as age, height, occupation and education, and this effect was particularly strong when choosers were confronted with a larger number of opposite-sex speed daters. Additionally, participants attending events in which the available options showed greater variety across these attributes were less likely to choose the consensually preferred mate option and more likely to choose no one at all. In contexts in which time is a limited resource, choice variety — rather than facilitating choice quality or increasing choosiness— is confusing and potentially detrimental to choice quality."
More Articles
- Press Briefing by White House COVID-19 Response Team and Public Health Officials: Dating Sites Like Bumble, Tinder, Hinge, Match, OkCupid, BLK, Chispa, Plenty of Fish, and Badoo Anouncing Features to Encourage Vaccinations
- Elaine Soloway's Hometown Rookie: Mirror, Mirror; Jealous; Terms of Endearment
- Did I Miss Something? Belated Thoughts on a Matchmaker's Skill
- Take Note, All Women of the Elastic Generation, Here and Abroad: Lifestyles and Attitudes of British Women Aged Between 53 and 72 About Fashion and Tech
- Elaine Soloway's Rookie Widow Series: Pick-Up Lines; All Dressed Up And ... Playing the Field
- New Year's Peeve; Forgetting Self-Improvement Vows
- Why Individuals Tend to Be Paired with Partners Who Have Similar Physical, Behavioral and Psychological Characteristics
- Elaine Soloway's Rookie Widow Series: To Be Adored; Holiday Parties and Offended2013
- Elaine Soloway's Rookie Widow Series: Jealousy At The Gym; A Resting Place In The Garden of Eden; From Third Wheel to Driver's Seat
- Interracial marriage: Who is ‘marrying out’?