A federal judge has accepted Medicare's plans to try once more to correct a commonly held misconception that beneficiaries’ are eligible for coverage for physical and occupational therapy and other skilled care only if their health is improving.

"Confusion over the Improvement Standard persists," wrote US. District Court Chief Judge Christina Reiss in Vermont in a decision released by the court. Advocates for seniors say coverage is often mistakenly denied simply because the beneficiary reaches "a plateau" and is no longer making progress.

The ruling comes after the 2013 settlement of a class action lawsuit against the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Under the settlement, the government conducted an education campaign for its claims processors and others to make sure they understood that improvement was not required as long as seniors otherwise qualified for coverage.

The beneficiaries' lawyers argued — and the judge agreed — that the effort had failed and additional steps were necessary. She approved most of the suggestions for further actions proposed by the government last month and added two more proposed by the advocates.

The government will have a new website devoted to the 2013 settlement that will include information on how claims should be handled, as well as a simple explanation that improvement is not a criterion for coverage. The statement the judge accepted was largely written by the plaintiffs' lawyers and says, in part, "that the Medicare program will pay for skilled nursing care and skilled rehabilitation services when a beneficiary needs skilled care in order to maintain function or to prevent or slow decline or deterioration (provided all other coverage criteria are met)."

The judge also told the government to hold a second training session on the policy for claims processors, appeals judges and others — something Medicare officials had opposed — and even told them how to describe it to avoid any misunderstanding. But she rejected the plaintiffs’ arguments that they should help develop the training and other messages so that the government would not repeat past mistakes.

These measures must be completed by Sept. 4. The government has 14 days to file an objection to the decision.

A Medicare spokesman reached Thursday afternoon declined to comment.

Although the order won't affect seniors who have already been denied coverage, Stein said it can give them new ammunition for an appeal.

"If they think the reason they were denied was because the skilled therapy or nursing care was provided to maintain their condition or slow deterioration," she said, "then hopefully this will provide more strength for an appeal and in the future more strength for the provider to submit the claim as covered in the first case."

Kaiser Health News, a nonprofit health newsroom whose stories appear in news outlets nationwide, is an editorially independent part of the Kaiser Family Foundation.

More Articles

• Medicare Advantage Increasingly Popular With Seniors — But Not Hospitals and Doctors
• National Institutes of Health: Common Misconceptions About Vitamins and Minerals
• Medical Billing and Collections Among Older Americans
• A Yale Medicine Doctor Explains How Naloxone, a Medication That Reverses an Opioid Overdose, Works
• Kaiser Health News*: May 11th Era of ‘Free’ Covid Vaccines, Test Kits, and Treatments Is Ending. Who Will Pay the Tab Now?
• Congressional Budget Office: Federal Budget Deficit Totals $1.4 Trillion in 2023; Annual Deficits Average $2.0 Trillion Over the 2024–2033 Period
• Senator Ron Wyden's Office: On Health Care, Inflation Reduction Act Includes the Culmination of Wyden’s Work On the Finance Committee to Address the High Cost of Prescription Drugs
• Kaiser Health News Research Roundup: Pan-Coronavirus Vaccine; Long Covid; Supplemental Vitamin D; Cell Movement
• How They Did It: Tampa Bay Times Reporters Expose High Airborne Lead Levels at Florida Recycling Factory
• Press Briefing by White House COVID19 Response Team and Public Health Officials; December 15, 2021