*KFF: Gaps in Cost Sharing Protections for COVID-19 Testing and Treatment Could Spark Public Concerns About COVID-19 Vaccine Costs
Karyn Schwartz Follow @KarynLSchwartz on Twitter,
Loopholes that have led to out-of-pocket costs for COVID-19 testing
Gaps in the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act leave some patients with private insurance unprotected when they get a COVID-19 test from an out-of-network provider — those providers are not limited in what they can charge patients and are allowed to bill patients directly for the entire cost of testing and related services, leaving insured patients to submit claims for reimbursement themselves.
Federal law also does not prohibit out-of-network providers from balance billing for COVID-19 tests and related services. Instead, the law requires providers to publicly post their cash charges for testing and related services and requires insurers to reimburse the providers at their cash price if posted, but the law is silent on what insurers must pay for COVID-19 tests and related services rendered by out-of-network providers if no cash price has been posted.
Additionally, COVID-19 testing may not qualify for coverage by private insurance if it is deemed to not be medically necessary, for example, testing for travel or employment.
Patients with Medicare have more comprehensive coverage for COVID-19 testing with no cost sharing. This also is true for Medicaid enrollees while states are receiving enhanced federal matching funds tied to the COVID-19 public health emergency.
After the public health emergency is lifted, some Medicaid enrollees may face nominal cost sharing, and some Medicaid adults (low-income parents, pregnant women, seniors, and people with disabilities who do not receive an “alternative benefit plan”) may not have coverage unless states choose to cover diagnostic tests.
Lack of comprehensive protections against out-of-pocket costs for COVID-19 treatment
In contrast to COVID-19 testing, there are few federal requirements related to COVID-19 treatment. For example, no changes were made to Medicare cost sharing rules, meaning that Medicare beneficiaries in traditional Medicare could face more than $1,400 in cost sharing if they are hospitalized for COVID-19 and do not have supplemental coverage, while those in Medicare Advantage could face higher or lower costs for a hospitalization depending on their plan.
Pages: 1 · 2
More Articles
- Federal Reserve: Optimism in the Time of COVID; Businesses Seem Much Better Adapted to Remaining Open
- Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden We’ve never backed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history — until now
- Some of Representative John Lewis' Most Recent Statements: "The Conscience of Congress"; Former President Barack Obama on Lewis' Death
- The Evasive Virus: Uncovering the Potency and Evasiveness of the COVID-19 Virus
- Oklahoma’s ‘Precedent-Setting’ Suit Puts Opioid Drugmakers On Trial, With a Judge and No Jury
- Scout Report: Computer Dating, "Nel Blu Dipinto Di Blu", Western Front WWI,Women's History, Vaccinations, Newsmap, "Look Out Honey, 'Cause I'm Using Technology"
- More Than One-Third of People with Traditional Medicare Spent at Least 20 Percent of Their Total Income on Health Care in 2013
- From the CDC: Flu Vaccines Have Been Updated This Season to Better Match Circulating Viruses
- California, Oregon Pharmacists Can Prescribe Birth Control Pills: Uncoupling Exams From Prescriptions
- Getting Past It: Let’s Look for Ways to Serve Multiple Intelligences