A Most Unique Statement From FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., On Efforts to Safeguard Women’s Health From Deceptive Health Claims and Significant Risks Related to Devices Marketed for Use in Medical Procedures for “Vaginal Rejuvenation"
Our most fundamental obligation to the American public is providing patients with access to safe and effective medical products to meet their health care needs as well as protecting them from harmful products and deceptive medical claims. A large part of our work focuses on efforts to bring forth innovative, new products. But we’re equally dedicated to monitoring the landscape to ensure products are delivering on their intended benefits and to ensure that if new health risks arise, we take appropriate action.
Scott Gottlieb, right, Commissioner of Food and Drugs
Delivering on this complementary mission is a key aim of our Medical Device Safety Action Plan. The plan outlines how the FDA will encourage innovation to improve safety, detect safety risks earlier and keep doctors and patients better informed. Our plan would establish a robust medical device patient safety net in the U.S. We are taking steps to streamline and modernize how we implement post-market actions to address device safety issues to make our response to risks more timely and effective.
Advancing the health of women is a priority for the FDA. As part of our action plan, we’re working to improve evidence generation about the safety and effectiveness of health technologies in clinical areas that are unique to women. And as part of these efforts, we also watch for, and take action against, bad actors who unfortunately take advantage of unsuspecting consumers by marketing unapproved, deceptive products that may pose safety risks and violate the trust of American consumers.
That’s what we’re doing today.
We’ve recently become aware of a growing number of manufacturers marketing “vaginal rejuvenation” devices to women and claiming these procedures will treat conditions and symptoms related to menopause, urinary incontinence or sexual function. The procedures use lasers and other energy-based devices to destroy or reshape vaginal tissue. These products have serious risks and don’t have adequate evidence to support their use for these purposes. We are deeply concerned women are being harmed.
As part of our efforts to promote women’s health, the FDA has cleared or approved laser and energy-based devices for the treatment of serious conditions like the destruction of abnormal or pre-cancerous cervical or vaginal tissue, as well as condylomas (genital warts). But the safety and effectiveness of these devices hasn’t been evaluated or confirmed by the FDA for “vaginal rejuvenation.” In addition to the deceptive health claims being made with respect to these uses, the “vaginal rejuvenation” procedures have serious risks. In some cases, these devices are being marketed for this use to women who have completed treatment for breast cancer and are experiencing symptoms caused by early menopause. The deceptive marketing of a dangerous procedure with no proven benefit, including to women who’ve been treated for cancer, is egregious.
Pages: 1 · 2
More Articles
- Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: Shift in Confidence and Fear Could Prevent Consumers From Rebounding to Their Investment and Spending Habits
- Women Firefighters Face High Exposure to Toxic ‘Forever Chemicals’ Known to Interfere with Immune and Endocrine Functions and Breast Development
- "A Whole New Dimension to Immune Therapy": Getting a More Robust Immune Reaction Against a Tumor
- After 55: Changing to Every Other Year for Mammograms
- Editorial in JAMA Journal Oncology: Rethinking the Standard for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treatment
- 5th White House Science Faire; The Theme? Diversity and Inclusion in STEM
- Congressional Bills Introduced: IRS & Trafficking, Ratifying CEDAW; Campus Sexual Violence; Tax Credits
- "Too Much Medicine": Overdiagnosed and Overtreated, A Scientific Panel Recommends Personalized Cancer Strategies
- The Gene Patent Decision Explained by the Supreme Court Blog: In Plain English
- Are Genes Ownable? Challenging Patents on Breast and Ovarian Cancer Genes in the Supreme Court